Ads

Wednesday, May 15, 2019

Bengaluru’s BTS Main Road will be affected by proposed elevated corridor: Activists

Civic Issues
Activists, who conducted a social impact assessment of the elevated corridor project say shop owners were unaware they might lose their shops to the proposed corridor.
Bengaluru activists conducted the second phase of the social impact assessment on the controversial elevated corridor project proposed by the state government in Bengaluru. It found that shop-owners along the side of BTS Main Road, where a section of the corridor is proposed to be built, were unaware that they might lose their shops. The social impact assessment is being carried out by a team consisting of members of Bengaluru Bus Prayanikara Vedike, Citizens for Bengaluru, The Student Outpost and Bengaluru Suddi. The controversial elevated corridor project was proposed by the Karnataka government. It plans to build a network of elevated corridors in Bengaluru. The plan has come under criticism from residents and activists who argue that the project will only add to the city's traffic issues and lead to loss of green cover.  The Karnataka High Court has put the project on hold by passing an interim stay order on starting work on the project until the next hearing in the case on June 3.  Activists conducting the social impact assessment say that they have taken up the task of doing it since the state government is yet to conduct its own social impact assessment, as mandated by the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013. An environmental impact assessment report prepared by Karnataka Road Development Corporation Ltd. (KRDCL) noted that over 1100 properties will be affected by the project. This includes 209 residential. 577 commercial and 32 religious properties which the government must acquire by spending over Rs 11,000 crore The social impact assessment conducted by activists identified several issues related to the impact the elevated corridor will have on communities, public infrastructure and the environment. "The detailed feasibility report itself states that in the N-S corridor, more than 250 properties are to be affected. In this stretch covered today, it was seen that many of the houses, shops are likely to be impacted," reads the report. The maximum impact was observed on BTS Main Road, which is just 12 metres wide. The proposed elevated corridor is 19 metres wide and would need properties to be acquired on both sides of the road.  The assessment also noted that none of the property owners knew that their shops might be acquired for the project. "Many of the properties have been marked with yellow paint, and residents were unaware of why this is so. Similar markings can be seen in the Jayamahal portion of the elevated corridor as well. There are also several street vendors who were there who did not know of the corridor and were apprehensive of the impact of the corridor," adds the report.  The project is also expected to have an adverse impact on the environment at the heart of the story. The social impact assessment also noted that some of the pillars of the elevated corridor will be inside the storm-water drain along BTS Main Road. According to the National Green Tribunal (NGT) and orders of the Karnataka High Court, this is illegal. Around 274 Trees along BTS Main Road could be cut down for the project.  Further, a study conducted by the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) has also found that the construction of the elevated corridor will lead to more traffic congestion and pollution in the future. A protest was held on March 16 in Bengaluru in which hundreds of residents and activists came together to demand a public consultation before the project is started by the state government. Following the protest, Chief Minister HD Kumaraswamy announced that a public consultation meeting will take place.  The next and final phase of the social impact assessment by activists will be completed on May 18.
Body 2: 


from Karnataka http://bit.ly/2YuMy9T
via IFTTT

Bengaluru’s BTS Main Road will be affected by proposed elevated corridor: Activists

Infrastructure
Activists, who conducted a social impact assessment of the elevated corridor project say shop owners were unaware they might lose their shops to the proposed corridor.
Bengaluru activists conducted the second phase of the social impact assessment on the controversial elevated corridor project proposed by the state government in Bengaluru. It found that shop-owners along the side of BTS Main Road, where a section of the corridor is proposed to be built, were unaware that they might lose their shops. The social impact assessment is being carried out by a team consisting of members of Bengaluru Bus Prayanikara Vedike, Citizens for Bengaluru, The Student Outpost and Bengaluru Suddi. The controversial elevated corridor project was proposed by the Karnataka government. It plans to build a network of elevated corridors in Bengaluru. The plan has come under criticism from residents and activists who argue that the project will only add to the city's traffic issues and lead to loss of green cover.  The Karnataka High Court has put the project on hold by passing an interim stay order on starting work on the project until the next hearing in the case on June 3.  Activists conducting the social impact assessment say that they have taken up the task of doing it since the state government is yet to conduct its own social impact assessment, as mandated by the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013. An environmental impact assessment report prepared by Karnataka Road Development Corporation Ltd. (KRDCL) noted that over 1100 properties will be affected by the project. This includes 209 residential. 577 commercial and 32 religious properties which the government must acquire by spending over Rs 11,000 crore The social impact assessment conducted by activists identified several issues related to the impact the elevated corridor will have on communities, public infrastructure and the environment. "The detailed feasibility report itself states that in the N-S corridor, more than 250 properties are to be affected. In this stretch covered today, it was seen that many of the houses, shops are likely to be impacted," reads the report. The maximum impact was observed on BTS Main Road, which is just 12 metres wide. The proposed elevated corridor is 19 metres wide and would need properties to be acquired on both sides of the road.  The assessment also noted that none of the property owners knew that their shops might be acquired for the project. "Many of the properties have been marked with yellow paint, and residents were unaware of why this is so. Similar markings can be seen in the Jayamahal portion of the elevated corridor as well. There are also several street vendors who were there who did not know of the corridor and were apprehensive of the impact of the corridor," adds the report.  The project is also expected to have an adverse impact on the environment at the heart of the story. The social impact assessment also noted that some of the pillars of the elevated corridor will be inside the storm-water drain along BTS Main Road. According to the National Green Tribunal (NGT) and orders of the Karnataka High Court, this is illegal. Around 274 Trees along BTS Main Road could be cut down for the project.  Further, a study conducted by the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) has also found that the construction of the elevated corridor will lead to more traffic congestion and pollution in the future. A protest was held on March 16 in Bengaluru in which hundreds of residents and activists came together to demand a public consultation before the project is started by the state government. Following the protest, Chief Minister HD Kumaraswamy announced that a public consultation meeting will take place. The next and final phase of the social impact assessment by activists will be completed on May 18.
Body 2: 


from Karnataka http://bit.ly/2Vt0L5D
via IFTTT

EC probing cash-for-votes charge against Karnataka Min DK Shivakumar

Politics
In its complaint, the BJP alleged that Shivakumar was distributing cash to local influential leaders to distribute to voters on the day of bye-polls in Kundgol.
The Election Commission (EC) has ordered an inquiry into a charge by the BJP that Karnataka Water Resources Minister D.K. Shivakumar distributed cash to voters ahead of the May 19 by-election in the Kundagola Assembly segment in Dharwad, an official said on Tuesday. "We have asked our District Electoral Officer M. Deepa to inquire into the allegation that the Minister was distributing cash to voters and community leaders," Karnataka's Additional Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) K.G. Jagadeesha told IANS here. In a complaint to the state CEO on Monday, BJP legal cell member M. Vinod Kumar alleged that Shivakumar, staying at Hotel Cotton County near Hubli airport and campaigning for Congress candidate Kusumavati Channabasappa, was distributing cash to also local influential leaders to distribute it to the voters ahead of the polling day. "As the BJP complaint was without audio or video evidence, we have asked the DEO to crosscheck with our flying squads and observers deployed in the Assembly segment to prevent any malpractice or violation of the model code of conduct," said Jagadeesha. The party candidate (Kusumavati) is the widow of Congress Minister for Municipalities C.S. Shivalli, whose death on March 22 necessitated the bye-poll. The BJP had fielded S.I. Chikkanagoudar, who lost to Shivalli by just 633 votes in Assembly elections in May 2018.
Body 2: 


from Karnataka http://bit.ly/2JEEcbL
via IFTTT

5 key questions about the country's first public option



from Health Care https://politi.co/2HjlHry
via IFTTT

Tuesday, May 14, 2019

Karnataka government launches district-wise call centres for water scarcity complaints

Water
To avail this service, people have to dial their district code followed by 10771.
The Karnataka government has introduced district-wise call centres for citizens to file complaints of water scarcity in their districts. This comes at a time when 3122 taluks of the state are facing scarcity of water. A state-level call centre exists, but district-level call centres have been established in order to ensure swift action by district administrations. To use this service, people have to dial their district code followed by 10771. Commenting on the process of filing complaints and how these complaints are addressed, K Nagesh, a geologist at the Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, said, “Once the complaint is filed, the Executive Officer in charge of that particular village is given directions to examine the water problems in the village of the complainant. They then produce reports to the Panchayat Development officer to supply water to the same. One single complaint from the resident of a village is enough to demand action. It is not necessary for a large number of people to file complaints.” Villages with private borewells nearby are connected via pipelines, while other areas receive drinking water through tankers. Somashekhar, a statistical officer at State Emergency Operation System of Revenue Department (Disaster Management) stated that water was being supplied to 27 districts, where 1365 villages receive water through 2184 tankers. He added that for supplying water to 1256 villages, 1652 private borewells have been hired. “We are using part of the Calamity Relief Fund for this purpose. For the implementation of this policy, we have already released Rs 2 crore for each drought-affected taluk,” he added. According to Nagesh, the district-wise call centre facility is a temporary measure in order to combat drought problems in the state. “It is just an alternative measure which will continue to operate until rainfall increases the groundwater level,” he said.
Body 2: 


from Karnataka http://bit.ly/2E7UZR4
via IFTTT

Mangaluru man assaulted by mob for ‘being gay’: 3 arrested

Crime
Videos shared widely on social media showed the mob assaulting the victim and forcibly cutting his hair with a sickle.
Mangaluru police have arrested three individuals, a day after the police took-up a suo motu case against a mob for attacking Daiva Patri Rajesh*. The mob assaulted Rajesh alleging that he is gay and was in a sexual relationship with another local resident. A Daiva Patri is a performer who invokes holy spirits during rituals.  The arrests were made after police officials at Barke police station in the city took note of videos shared widely on social media of a man being assaulted by a mob and registered a suo-motu case.  According to the police, the allegations by the mob is of little significance since the Supreme Court has struck down provisions of Section 377 in 2018. "The male partner of Rajesh was a major, so no case can be made against him. Whereas, the three individuals have gravely assaulted Rajesh - for which we have taken action," a police official said. In the two videos, one of which was 1:11 minutes and another 4:31 minutes, the mob speaking in Tulu alleged that Rajesh Poojary was indulging in sexual acts with a man and assaulted him. The victim Rajesh Poojary, a Daiva Patri is seen being questioned by the crowd. He was also dragged by the crowd and repeatedly assaulted by them. The crowd while questioning (inaudible) Rajesh, hurled abuses and attempts to tear off his shirt. Taking note of his long hair, the crowd initially brought an ordinary razor blade to shave-off his long hair, usually displayed by Daiva Patris, to which a lone woman (Rajesh’s mother) is seen pleading the crowd to stop. She is heard saying, "Don’t chop his hair”, while blocking her son’s head. However, the crowd paid no heed to her appeals. An unidentified voice in the crowd is heard saying, “You go back, he thinks he can do all that to a boy and get away. What if something had gone wrong". Another voice is heard telling the woman “What if, someone had done something to your own daughter. Go on, cut the hair,” they told each other. The crowd, clearly inexperienced in cutting hair, gave up on the idea of shaving Rajesh’s hair with the ordinary razor blade, then uses a small sickle (used ceremoniously to cut beetle nut) to chop the pony hair, while ordering Rajesh to remove the bangle (worn by a Daiva Patri). Few in the crowd were seen discouraging the angry mob from assaulting Rajesh. Meanwhile, Mangaluru City Police Commissioner Sandeep Patil told the media that police are investigating a suo-motu case. “Irrespective of any allegation, nobody authorised to assault another individual. The case has been registered at Barke Police station, investigation will follow,” he said. Story by Story Infinity (Subs and Scribes Media Ventures LLP.)
Body 2: 


from Karnataka http://bit.ly/30h9Qls
via IFTTT

Why the Karnataka Medical Council is against online consultation apps

Health
The Karnataka Medical Council has recently denounced the use of such apps, going so far as to say that they should be banned.
Gone are the days where visiting the doctor for a check-up took a significant amount of time and effort. Recently, several online medical consultation platforms and apps have sprouted up, which allow people to seek medical advice from a doctor with their smartphones. However, the Karnataka Medical Council (KMC) has recently denounced the use of such apps, going so far as to say that they should be banned. “Online consultation using these apps violates ethical medical practice. These apps are unethical and there is no question about it,” states Karnataka Medical Council Vice President Dr Kanchi Prahlad. The Medical Council of India (MCI) has listed a code of medical ethics which all doctors must adhere to, and the KMC feels that providing consultations over online platforms violates this code. The doctor further notes that it is only when consultations are done in person that the patient examined is properly, allowing for any later complications to be avoided. The KMC states that this is the same as “playing with a patient’s life.” However, this view is not shared by all doctors. Many medical practitioners feel that online consultations may save time and allow for more people to access healthcare. Patients, on the other hand, get almost instant access to a doctor who can then prescribe medication or lab tests as deemed necessary. One Bengaluru based physician notes that utilising such a platform has made it easier to reach more people and added that patients might find it easier to approach someone online out of fear of being shamed. Responding to arguments such as this, the KMC has one question: how can the quality of healthcare be effectively assessed? “It can’t be determined properly, that’s the whole point,” adds Dr Kanchi. While the KMC takes cognisance of the role played by technology in the healthcare industry, it dismisses the virtual platforms which give medical advice. The problem doesn’t end there alone. An online presence means that patients have the ability to be relatively more anonymous than in person. This opens up another set of concerns altogether with regard to safety and confidentiality. Dr Sweta Singh, a gynaecologist from NCR, received a really awkward query from a man in November 2016. The 35-year-old patient wanted to know if it was possible that a child he had sexually assaulted could get pregnant. While she took the appropriate action against the man, the process took time as she did not have access to his contact details. The KMC has sought for such apps and platforms to be banned, the outcome of which is yet to be known.
Body 2: 


from Karnataka http://bit.ly/2HmVSqZ
via IFTTT