Ads

Wednesday, January 15, 2020

Massive protest in Mangaluru against CAA and NRC, a month after police firing

CAA
Activist Harsh Mander and retired Supreme Court judge Gopal Gowda, who chaired a People's Tribunal in Mangaluru also addressed the protesters.
A sea of people, almost all men, convened at Adyar Kannur in Mangaluru on Wednesday in a massive protest against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and National Register of Citizens (NRC). The call for a protest was issued by 'We The People', a collective organising anti-CAA protests across the country. It was supported by Muslim organisations in Dakshina Kannada and it comes almost a month after two people were killed during anti-CAA protests on December 19 2019.    "The government is trying to instill fear in civil society and people will be scared to a certain extent, but eventually citizens will take to the streets. Amit Shah said he will not step back an inch on CAA but he is saying that after going two kilometres back," former IAS officer Kannan Gopinathan said while speaking at the event. "This is not just a Muslim protest. A Hindu rashtra is not just against Muslims in the country but also against Dalits and women. Unemployment and onion prices are at an all-time high. When the situation is like this, the government is asking you to identify yourself and not ask questions," human rights activist Shivasundar said while speaking at the protest. On Wednesday, more than 5,000 police personnel were deployed in Mangaluru. Activist Harsh Mander and retired Supreme Court judge Gopal Gowda, who chaired a People's Tribunal in Mangaluru following the police firing, also addressed the protesters.  Protesters gathered on the roads leading to Adyar Kannur on the outskirts of Mangaluru. Witnesses said that the road from Padil to Adyar Kannur, a distance of more than 3 km was blocked off by protesters. Almost all the protesters on Wednesday were men. While the exclusion of women from the protest was not announced by the organisers, former MLA Moiuddin Bawa courted controversy when he suggested that women are not welcome to the protest due to safety concerns. "When there are events held by the Muslim communities, arrangements made for women are communicated in advance. In the run-up to the protest this was not done and Moiuddin Bawa suggested that women should stay away from the protest as it was away from Mangaluru city and would cause an inconvenience to those who had to travel," a journalist based out of Mangaluru told TNM.   Women were not part of the first protest held in Mangaluru following the police firing on January 4. This was held at the KC Junction in Talapady amid heavy security deployment. Even on that occasion, safety was cited as the reason for excluding women from protests. A separate women's protest was held against CAA and NRC at Town Hall in Mangaluru on January 11. Scores of women held placards and raised slogans during the protest.    
Body 2: 


from Karnataka https://ift.tt/2FQD1TB
via IFTTT

'Why this hatred towards us?' Bengaluru college students question heckling by BJP MLA

Controversy
"They verbally abused students claiming that we dress inappropriately and that our behaviour is anti-Indian," said the statement by Srishti students.
A day after students and staff of the Srishti School of Art, Design and Technology were heckled by BJP Yelahanka MLA SR Vishwanath and his group along with a few local residents, the students have put out a statement asking why there was so much of hatred directed towards them. On 14 January, the MLA and a group of people went to the college and threatened students of legal action over graffiti outside the college. A graffiti that said 'Sab Changa si,' had been painted outside the college, which the BJP alleged was disrespectful to PM Narendra Modi. The group also threatened the college students over vehicles parked outside the college, and mocked the length of the students’ clothing. In the statement, the students say that Srishti has always tried to work with the community, and are they shocked at the backlash. “We ask openly, is your hatred towards us really because of the length of our skirts, scribbles on walls or the fact that we occupy parking space? What is really bothering you? What are you angry about? Let's talk about it, let's navigate this nonviolently, and continue doing what we do best to question, converse, listen and create.” The MLA's men had painted over the graffiti after confronting the guards and staff at the college. The same day, members of RSS, VHP and other pro-Hindu groups had painted over graffiti at Church Street in Bengaluru. On Monday night, two unknown persons had painted graffiti against the BJP, Modi and CAA all over Church street. Reacting to this, the students said, "A group of men complained about their sentiments being hurt because of a certain piece of public art and they painted over the said controversial artwork and other street art in saffron. This censoring and saffronisation of street art has happened all across the city of Bangalore on this day." The students also alleged that other than moral policing them, the MLA and his group threatened them. "The people accompanying the MLA started heckling and verbally abusing students claiming that we dress inappropriately and that our behaviour is Anti-Indian. This was also followed by a threat physical violence and safety of students. Comments such as 'Enthentha batte hakondthare hodi nam kaill nodak agala. Avar appa amman mundenu hege batte hakothara" were shouted at us, translating to "look at the clothes they wear we can't bear to see people in such clothing, do they dress like that around their parents too?'". The statement also quoted the BJP MLA's veiled threat to the students wherein he said, "If we wanted to be aggressive we could have and they would not have withstood us." The statement by the students also explained what transpired on Tuesday. "On the 14 of January 2020, Tuesday, a politically motivated group of people under the BJP MLA S.R. Vishwanath, Yelahanka MLA and CM's Political Secretary stormed the main gate of Srishti Institute of Art, Design and Technology, NS Campus. They started picking up student vehicles, parked on the road outside the main gate and threatened to take them to the Yelahanka New Town Traffic Police Station. Srishti, as an institute and community have been active citizens of Yelahanka for over 20 years and have coexisted without much trouble for all these years." They expressed alarm at the manner in which students were threatened. “Considering that the larger majority of students in this institute are women, Srishti students have faced several other challenges within the neighbourhood, however have managed to work things out in a participatory way. Our students and faculty have always striven to ensure well-being for the people of Yelahanka. It is therefore alarming when statements threatening violence against our students are being vocalized openly.” The college had declared a two-day holiday following the incident. Read: BJP MLA accuses Bengaluru college students of painting anti-Modi graffiti, threatens staff
Body 2: 


from Karnataka https://ift.tt/2QVThck
via IFTTT

1800 trees to be felled in Bengaluru? Activists call public hearing a sham

Environment
The people who were part of the public consultation were unhappy with the proceedings at the public consultation, where the officials provided no alternatives to cutting the 100-year-old trees.
File photo
The Karnataka Forest Department held a public hearing on Tuesday to listen to what the people have to say about the cutting down of over 1800 trees in the outskirts of Bengaluru, for a road widening project. But the residents and activists who were present at the hearing called it a sham. For one, the public was intimated about the meeting only on Tuesday morning via a newspaper announcement. Secondly, the Forest Department seemed to have made up their mind on the matter, and were simply holding the meeting for the sake of procedure, alleged activists.  The meeting was held on the side of the highway near the Attibele RTO check post. “We were informed about this public hearing only this morning through the papers,” said Prabha Dev, one of the activists who has been closely involved with tree conservation in the city, “The meeting is scheduled on a weekday, in the middle of the day. How many of us are able to travel so far, leaving all our other work without proper intimation? I was out of town and came back once I found out about it.” There are a total of 1834 trees to be cut in two road widening projects which are namely Attibele to Sarjapura to State Highway 35, and Besthamanahalli to Hoskote Road (National Highway 4). These projects, according to engineers with the KRDCL(Karnataka Road Development Corporation Limited), are to decongest traffic in the city and to connect Anekal, Whitefield, and Hoskote to the Airport. “These are all old heritage trees that are more than 100 years old. They are mother trees that provide shade and food for numerous birds, monkeys and other animals. Cutting these down only increases the human animal conflict. They also maintain the water table in low rainfall areas. Cutting down such trees must be condemned,” said tree activist Arun Prasad.  The meeting was called for on the basis of a High Court order, which states that the public must have a hearing about whether the trees should be cut or not. However, while the officials took down people's suggestions, they seemed to have already made up their mind that the trees will be cut down, said activists.  A notification came last month regarding the Expert Tree Committee inspection of more than 3,500 trees marked for felling. A Karnataka High Court order was passed, based on a court case by conservationist activists led by Dattatraya T. Devare, which says that no trees could be cut without approval by the expert tree committee, as well as a public consultation. However, the tree committee has not given its report yet.  Read: Will over 3,500 trees in Bengaluru be axed? Activists await expert committee’s report The public began by questioning the need for a road widening project. “We don’t have any traffic problems. The roads were recently widened, and trees were cut for that also. But those trees were not replaced. Heavy traffic like trucks coming from Tamil Nadu have been redirected to come through Sarjapur due to Metro construction activities. But otherwise there is no problem for traffic as such, only during school timings there is a problem due to parking on the road,” said one resident.  However, officials were not willing to listen to such questions, said activists.  Ashok Narayan, the Environmental Officer with the KRDCL said, “This meeting is only for the trees, and not regarding the road. The tenders have already been passed, the plans are laid out, and we are only waiting to begin the project. We have conducted the surveys for traffic, and we believe that the road needs to be widened.” When the public asked for the documentation for its justification, they were asked to go to the KRDCL office. The public also raised the issues of habitat for birds and wildlife, including monkeys that begin raiding crops when there is no food for them in the trees. “The government promises to do replantation of all the trees but we barely see any results. Even if they do tree planting, they do not take care of the trees like they should. Besides, they don’t plant fruit bearing trees or any native trees. Instead what is planted is plantation trees which have high economic value like Teak, Mahogany, and other foreign trees. This is not acceptable as these trees will only be cut for profit in the future, and don't give proper habitat for wildlife,” said Manjunath G, a farmer and resident of Chandapura who was part of the meeting. Environmentalist Vijay Nishant gave the suggestion that the road should be designed in such a way that there is space to plant more trees. “We know that in urban areas it’s difficult to get even 2-3 meters of extra land. But in rural areas this is not the case. We should have it in the design of the project itself that there is space for trees on both sides of the road as well as in the center of the road. We cannot have rapid tree fellings in our city, in the name of development, or it will result in a situation like Delhi where it is among the most polluted cities in Asia." Other activists were not at all happy with the way the public consultation was held. “The public hearing is held with only junior level officers like ACF (Additional Conservator of Forests) and AEE (Assistant Executive Engineer). These individuals are lower ranking officers like circle inspectors. They don’t have the power to make any changes or give any concrete solutions. Only IFS officers have any powers, but they don’t come to the public meetings. Instead, they send lower ranking officials who come to the meetings and only say that we do not have the power. Then what is the point of having such consultations? They should not even be considered as valid,” said Arun Prasad, an environmental activist. Meanwhile, the long-awaited report from the Expert Tree committee is still pending. There is another public consultation, with all the stakeholders, consisting of the expert tree committee and the public, as well as government officials from the Forest Department and the KRDCL who will have another meeting, which will be announced at a later date.     
Body 2: 


from Karnataka https://ift.tt/2QULHOP
via IFTTT

Jayadeva flyover in Bengaluru to be demolished soon for metro rail

Infrastructure
The flyover, which was opened in 2006, was earlier set to be demolished in July last year, and was closed for traffic prior to that.
R Srikanth/WikiCommons
The Jayadeva flyover is an iconic flyover that has been around for 12 years in South Bengaluru. It connects Bannerghatta with the Silk Board as well as the IT corridor in the area.  And now, officials say that they are going ahead with the Jayadeva flyover demolition in orderr to bring in Metro infrastructure. The flyover is named after the Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, which is just next to the flyover. Being a busy stretch, the Jayadeva junction required a flyover, which took a total of four years to construct and was opened in 2006. It was built by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA), at a cost of 21 crores. However, the BMRCL identified the need for a metro station at the junction. The new structure which will replace the flyover will be have five levels. There will be an interchange for Metro Reach 5, Metro Reach 6, an elevated road (flyover), an underpass road, and the regular road between Silk board and South Bengaluru.  A senior traffic police officer told TNM that some essential infrastructure needs to be set in place before the Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd (BMRCL) is granted permission to begin the demolition. “Some work is pending regarding putting up boards on the roads like no parking board, take diversion board, and cat-eye reflectors. We have also asked the BMRCL to conduct demolitions only at night, as this would reduce the impact on regular motorists,” the official said.  Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP) Thimmaiah said that an official notification will be issued soon, after which the Metro will commence the demolition work.  The first intimation of the demolition came in July 2019 and has been consistently delayed for months. As a result, the traffic on the flyover has been diverted, in anticipation of the demolition. A significant section of south Bengaluru traffic was affected by this traffic diversion, especially those who travel between Bannerghatta Road and Silk Board junction.  Read: Traffic in Bengaluru to worsen as Jayadeva flyover will be demolished for metro work The new structure, which will replace the flyover, is one of the first road-and-rail flyovers in the city and costs more than Rs 130 crore. It was supposed to be ready by February 2020. However, this deadline is set to be pushed back much further due to the delay in demolition of Jayadeva flyover. The structure will accommodate the RV Road-Bommasandra Line (Reach 5) of the metro rail. 
Body 2: 


from Karnataka https://ift.tt/2sqMiyp
via IFTTT

Mysuru Bar Association refuses to appear for student who held 'Free Kashmir' placard

Controversy
A group of Bengaluru lawyers have condemned this and released a statement.
The Mysuru Bar association has decided not to represent a former student of  Mysuru University who is facing sedition charges for holding a “Free Kashmir” placard during a protest.  Responding to media reports of the Mysuru Bar's decision, a group of lawyers in Bengaluru have put out a resolution condemning the resolution. Nalini Balakumar is an ex student of Mysuru University, currently studying in another college and held a “Free Kashmir” placard during a protest in Mysuru on January 8, organised by Dalit Students’ Association and Mysore University Research Students Association.  Mysuru Bar Association president, S Anand Kumar said, “Our members submitted a requisition, requesting none of our lawyers represent Nalini (who displayed 'Free Kashmir' placard during protest against JNU Violence, at Mysuru University). We discussed and decided not to represent or provide legal services to the person involved in anti-national activities.” Responding to this, a group of Bengaluru lawyers in their statement said, “We, the undersigned lawyers, strongly condemn such decision of the Association as not only being against professional ethics and the duties of lawyers under the Bar Council of India Rules, but also as being antithetical to the values embedded in the Constitution of India. Every person has the fundamental right to be represented in a Court of law and any attempt to prevent or subvert such right is a blatant attack on the ideals of the Constitution.” The statement went on to demand that the Mysuru Bar withdraw their decision.  The lawyer who was part of the bail hearing, Pruthvi, has withdrawn from the case following the controversy. Nalini had approached a sessions court for bail and she had been given anticipatory bail on condition that she would not leave Mysuru.  There are two cases against her, one filed suo moto by the Jayalakshmipuram police, and then by the Registrar of Mysuru University. The Second Additional District and Sessions Court has adjourned the hearing for January 20. However, even though the Mysuru lawyers have refused to be a part of the case, sources say that Nalini does have legal representation. Deccan Herald reported that Marideviah, the student union leader of UoM (University of Mysuru) Researchers Association, also named in the FIR, has not been arrested by the police. The student had come forward earlier to give a statement about the poster. “I want to clarify regarding the placard ‘Free Kashmir’ that I was holding at the protest organised at the University of Mysore on January 8. I was trying to bring notice to the Internet shutdown which has been imposed in the valley through the placard. From August 5th, 2019, about 156 days since the abrogation of article 370, there has been an Internet blockade which has resulted in the silencing of Kashmir. We haven’t heard from them for 5 months and 2 days," Nalini had said.
Body 2: 


from Karnataka https://ift.tt/35RL1hp
via IFTTT

5 kg of smuggled gold worth Rs 2 cr seized by Mangaluru air cargo officials

Crime
The seizure also led to the arrest of the director of a company allegedly on whose behalf the gold was being smuggled and another person working with the company.
In one of the biggest seizures of smuggled gold in Mangaluru, five kg of the precious metal which is valued to be worth Rs 2 crore was recovered at the Air Cargo Complex on Tuesday. The seizure also led to the arrest of the director of a company allegedly on whose behalf the gold was being smuggled. Acting on a tip-off the officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) Mangaluru and Bengaluru in a coordinated effort unraveled a unique modus of smuggling of gold through Air Cargo Complex, at Old Airport in Bajpe, Mangaluru. The smuggled gold was concealed in five metal sprockets which were imported by M/s Swaroop Mineral Pvt Ltd of Udupi in the name of “mining conveyor drive chain”.   Officials in the know said that the gold was deftly concealed inside the heavy metal sprockets by way of a groove and gave only a slight hint of tampering on physical examination. The scanning of the said wheels added to the suspicion and finally, the officers could retrieve the gold with the help of a local mechanic and lathe machine at Bajpe.  On examination by the authorized jeweller, five-round plates weighed 4995 grams by net weight after discounting the weight of aluminium coating.   The gold pieces were found to be of 24 karat purity and their current market value was placed at around 2 crores.  The contraband gold was later seized by the officers of DRI under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962.  The active director of M/S Swaroop Mineral Resources Manohar Kumar Poojari involved in the case was arrested in Bengaluru on the same day in a coordinated effort by DRI Bengaluru while Lohith Shriyan, a person hailing from Ashoknagar looking after the logistics of smuggling was also arrested by DRI Mangaluru.  Further investigation in the smuggling case is in progress to unearth the other members of the syndicate and the investors in the case, DRI officials added.
Body 2: 


from Karnataka https://ift.tt/2Rh7RKh
via IFTTT

Bengaluru activists meet Chief Secy, urge him to take up suburban rail work

Railways
Apart from meeting the state Chief Secretary, activists also sent petitions to the three MPs of Bengaluru.
Representational Image
In another effort to ensure the political leaders act on expanding suburban rail services for the in Bengaluru, a group of suburban rail crusaders from Praja RAAG, Citizens for Citizens and Karnataka Railway Vedike met Karnataka Chief Secretary (CS) TM Vijaya Bhaskar on Tuesday. They urged him to take up minor works even as the Union government drags its feet over setting up of a dedicated suburban railway system for Bengaluru. Read: Railway Board clears long-awaited Bengaluru suburban rail project They urged the CS to put further pressure the Union government to approve the decade-old demand which is touted to be a fix for Bengaluru’s traffic gridlock and growing pollution. The demands put forward on Tuesday were targeted towards streamlining of services from Bengaluru city to the airport. The activists wanted the state government to work towards electrification of the rail tracks from Yehalanka to Devanahalli stretch, and doubling the number of lines towards the airport. All these works can be completed within an expense of Rs 50 crore, the activists said, based on estimates by rail officials. The construction of a suburban rail station at the edge of the Kempegowda International Airport station is already underway. While it was initially promised that the station will be ready by December 2019, it is likely to be ready for use only by March 2020. Read: Bengaluru suburban rail services to airport likely to start before 2020 Other than this, the activists demanded that all railway level crossings be equipped with railway underbridges or railway overbridges, enabling maximum utilisation of the tracks. This move comes after the activists had petitioned the Bengaluru MPs for inclusion of certain long-pending demands of an overhaul of infrastructure. The petitions sent to BJP’s Tejasvi Surya, Sadanada Gowda and  PC Mohan urged the MPs to ensure that the upcoming budget allocates enough funds for Automatic Signalling work in Bengaluru City (Bengaluru to Bidadi, Bengaluru to Chikbanawar, YPR-Doddaballapur, Whitefield-Bangarpet and Bayyappanahalli-Hosur) costing Rs 250 Crore. They also urged for the electrification of 30-kilometre stretch of Yelahanka – Devanahalli costing Rs 40 Crore, and for a second terminal at Yesvanthpur Railway Station worth Rs 130 Crore.
Body 2: 


from Karnataka https://ift.tt/30lp3lU
via IFTTT