Ads

Monday, March 25, 2019

B’luru cop calls journo’s tweet on Kashmir student attack ‘illegal,’ faces criticism

Controversy
After Kashmiri journalist Fahad Shah tweeted about the attack, Whitefield DCP stated that tweeting about the incident was illegal and may instigate people.
Twitter
Is it illegal to post updates about an ongoing criminal investigation on social media? Deputy Commissioner of Police of Bengaluru’s Whitefield Division has been facing flak on Twitter after telling a journalist that he will be summoned to the police station for tweeting about the attack on a Kashmiri student which took place a few days ago. On March 20, 24-year-old Kashmiri student Asad Zahood Dhar was attacked by a group of four men who beat him with rods and one of them also had a knife. Fahad Shah, the editor of the magazine ‘The Kashmir Walla’ had posted a picture of Absar Zahoor Dhar, who was thrashed by four men on March 20, with a quote from him, that said, “They could have killed me... I’m living in fear, not attending college as the assailants roam free in front of my house as if nothing happened.” Dhar, the Kashmiri students, told TNM that though four people were initially arrested, they were let out on bail. Dhar also stated that he does not think he was attacked solely because he is a Kashmiri. On March 24, Whitefield DCP Abdul Ahad replied to Fahad’s tweet, saying, “Mr Fahad Shah, you are discussing a subject of investigation in public domain which is an offence. Four culprits have been arrested and 107 CrPC proceedings are on. You are warned against this illegal behaviour.” Mr Fahad Shah Ur discussing a subject of investigation in public domain which is an offence,4 culprits have been arrested and 107 CrPC proceedings on...Ur warned against this illegal behaviour. — Abdul Ahad IPS (@dcpwhitefield) March 24, 2019 Under Section 107 of the CrPC, if a Magistrate receives information that a person is likely to commit a breach of peace or disturb public tranquillity, a Magistrate can send a show cause notice to the person asking him why he should not be ordered to submit a bond (with or without sureties) for keeping the peace for a certain period. Fahad Shah responded to the DCP stating that what he had tweeted was in public domain and was already published in newspapers. As much as I have tweeted here (which is not a discussion or an opinion) was already published in newspaper - perhaps it should be found what’s already in public domain. Thanks. — Fahad Shah (@pzfahad) March 24, 2019 DCP Abdul Ahad stated on Twitter that the journalist would be asked to speak to an investigating officer and ensure that he is not “instigating people.” U will be asked to explain...u can give Ur clarification to the investigating officer..as a law abiding citizen IAM sure u will explain Ur stand to the satisfaction of investigating officer...and make sure that Ur not instigating people....it's a serious offence — Abdul Ahad IPS (@dcpwhitefield) March 24, 2019 The DCP’s response to the journalist has drawn criticism on social media. Several journalists and public figures pointed out that it was not illegal to post updates of an ongoing investigation. “Remember you are bound by Constitution of India, let me refresh your memory, Freedom of Expression is still a Fundamental Right which NO DCP can take it from any Indian,” AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi stated in a tweet to the DCP. Muhtaram,Aali Janab ,Your Excellency of course you can arrest,jail you have all the Taqaat remember you are bound by Constitution of INDIA ,let me refresh your memory Freedom of Expression is still a Fundamental Right which NO DCP can take it from any Indian Samjha — Asaduddin Owaisi (@asadowaisi) March 25, 2019 Why the hell are you threatening citizens? Under what law is discussion a public offence? Stop bullying people and abusing your office. — Dushyant (@atti_cus) March 24, 2019 Shooting the messenger. — Waheed وحید الرحمان پرہ (@parawahid) March 24, 2019 As per law, it is not against the rules for a journalist to report on an ongoing investigation. According to the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, fair and accurate report of a judicial proceeding (or any stage thereof) is not contempt. However, though Asad has stated that he was not attacked because he was a Kashmiri, it seems that the DCP was hinting that the news of his attack may instigate people. Shortly after the Pulwama terror attack which killed 40 CRPF jawans, there were reports of Kashmiri people in various parts of the country being abused and in some cases, assaulted.
Body 2: 


from Karnataka https://ift.tt/2HUbDGj
via IFTTT

No comments:

Post a Comment